• lenny-learning-logoLenny Learning
  • Home
    Home
  • Lessons
    Lessons
  • Curriculum
    Curriculum
  • Surveys
    Surveys
  • Videos
    Videos
  • Support
    Support
  • Log In

The Cognitive Detective

user image

Alyssa Bowers

Tier 3
For Schools

Lesson Plan

Detecting Cognitive Distortions

In this 50-minute one-on-one session, the client will identify at least three common cognitive distortions in their own thoughts and practice challenging one distortion through guided inquiry.

Detecting and reframing distorted thoughts reduces emotional distress, breaks negative cognitive cycles, and fosters healthier thinking patterns.

Audience

Adult One-on-One

Time

50 minutes

Approach

Structured self-discovery with therapist-led Socratic questioning.

Materials

Cognitive Detective Tools, Distortion Identification Checklist, Therapist Guided Inquiry, and Investigation Journal

Prep

Review Session Materials

10 minutes

  • Review the Detecting Cognitive Distortions lesson plan
  • Familiarize yourself with the Therapist Guided Inquiry
  • Prepare digital or printed copies of the Distortion Identification Checklist and Investigation Journal
  • Load and preview the Cognitive Detective Tools slide deck

Step 1

Introduction & Rapport

5 minutes

  • Greet the client and outline session goals
  • Introduce cognitive distortions via the first slides in Cognitive Detective Tools
  • Emphasize collaborative, nonjudgmental investigation of thoughts

Step 2

Identify Cognitive Distortions

15 minutes

  • Present a list of common distortions via slides
  • Ask the client to recall a recent stressful situation and note any automatic thoughts
  • Have the client complete the Distortion Identification Checklist
  • Discuss identified distortions and their emotional impact

Step 3

Guided Inquiry Practice

15 minutes

  • Choose one prominent distorted thought from the checklist
  • Use the Therapist Guided Inquiry to lead through Socratic questions:
    • What evidence supports this thought?
    • What evidence contradicts it?
    • Are there alternative explanations?
  • Encourage the client to record each step in the Investigation Journal

Step 4

Journal Reflection

10 minutes

  • Ask the client to complete the next section of the Investigation Journal:
    • Reframed thought
    • Emotional rating before and after reframing
    • Plans for testing the new perspective
  • Discuss reflections and any remaining challenges

Step 5

Wrap-Up & Homework

5 minutes

  • Summarize key insights and client progress
  • Assign daily practice:
    • Use the Distortion Identification Checklist on new thoughts
    • Record reflections in the Investigation Journal
  • Confirm next session focus and answer client questions
lenny

Slide Deck

Cognitive Detective Tools

An interactive guide to help you spot, investigate, and reframe common thinking traps.

Use the brand colors (#C27A3D for titles, #D28B4E accent elements, #E39C5F highlights). Welcome the client and introduce the purpose of today’s session. Explain that we’ll use “detective tools” to uncover and challenge unhelpful thinking patterns in a collaborative, nonjudgmental way.

Session Agenda

  1. Define Cognitive Distortions
  2. Review Common Distortions
  3. Introduce Detective Toolkit
  4. Interactive Thought Investigation
  5. Socratic Questioning Guide
  6. Next Steps & Homework

Outline the flow of today’s work. Use icon-style visuals next to each agenda item for visual clarity.

What Are Cognitive Distortions?

Cognitive distortions are habitual, biased ways of thinking that skew reality. They fuel negative emotions and maintain unhelpful beliefs.

Define distortions with simple language and a short illustrative graphic of “distorted lens.” Emphasize why these matter: they skew our view of reality.

Common Cognitive Distortions

• All-or-Nothing Thinking
• Overgeneralization
• Mental Filter
• Disqualifying the Positive
• Jumping to Conclusions
• Catastrophizing

Use a two-column layout or icons for each distortion. Briefly describe each and invite the client to note any that resonate.

Your Detective Toolkit

  1. Identify the Automatic Thought
  2. Gather Evidence For & Against
  3. Explore Alternative Explanations
  4. Reframe the Thought

Present the four detective steps as a simple roadmap graphic. Emphasize these are the core tools we’ll use.

Identifying Your Thought

• Situation: ___________________
• Automatic Thought: ______________
• Emotion & Intensity (0–10): ________

Include a form-style layout with blank lines for the client to fill in. Prompt them to recall a real situation now.

Socratic Questioning Guide

  1. What evidence supports this thought?
  2. What evidence contradicts it?
  3. Are there other ways to interpret the situation?
  4. What would you say to a friend thinking this way?

Display each Socratic question with a numbered list. Suggest the client write answers in their journal. Use highlight boxes around each question.

Next Steps & Homework

• Use the Distortion Identification Checklist on new thoughts daily
• Record investigations in your Journal
• Bring examples to our next session

Use a calendar icon or checklist graphic to reinforce homework. Confirm next session date and encourage ongoing practice.

lenny

Worksheet

Distortion Identification Checklist

Instructions

  1. Recall a recent situation that caused you stress or strong emotion.
  2. Briefly describe the situation and your automatic thought.

Situation:







Automatic Thought:







Identify Distortions

For each cognitive distortion below, check whether it applies to your automatic thought and provide a brief example of how it showed up.

1. All-or-Nothing Thinking
Viewing situations in black-and-white terms (e.g., “If I’m not perfect, I’ve failed.”)
Does this apply? [ ] Yes [ ] No
Example from my thought:






2. Overgeneralization
Drawing broad conclusions from a single event (e.g., “I always mess up.”)
Does this apply? [ ] Yes [ ] No
Example from my thought:






3. Mental Filter
Focusing only on the negative details and ignoring positives (e.g., filtering out compliments).
Does this apply? [ ] Yes [ ] No
Example from my thought:






4. Disqualifying the Positive
Rejecting positive experiences by insisting they “don’t count” (e.g., “They’re just being nice.”)
Does this apply? [ ] Yes [ ] No
Example from my thought:






5. Jumping to Conclusions
Making negative interpretations without evidence (e.g., mind reading or fortune telling).
Does this apply? [ ] Yes [ ] No
Example from my thought:






6. Catastrophizing
Expecting the worst possible outcome (e.g., “This is a disaster.”)
Does this apply? [ ] Yes [ ] No
Example from my thought:







Reflection

Which distortion felt most prominent in your thought?







On a scale of 0–10, how intense was your emotion before identifying the distortion? ____
After identifying it? ____







What brief statement could you use to remind yourself of a more balanced thought?






lenny
lenny

Script

Therapist Guided Inquiry Script

Teacher: “Now that we’ve identified one thought you’d like to explore, let’s use a set of guided questions to investigate it more deeply. Remember, there are no right or wrong answers. This is a collaborative detective process.”


1. Evidence For the Thought

Teacher: “First, let’s look at evidence that supports this automatic thought. I’ll ask the question, then give you a moment to think and jot down your ideas in your Investigation Journal.”

Teacher (Prompt): “What evidence do you have that this thought is true?”
(Pause for 30–45 seconds to allow client to reflect and write.)
Teacher (Follow-up if needed): “Can you think of a specific example or moment when this felt accurate?”


2. Evidence Against the Thought

Teacher: “Great. Now let’s consider evidence that doesn’t support the thought.”

Teacher (Prompt): “What facts or experiences contradict this thought?”
(Pause for 30–45 seconds.)
Teacher (Follow-up): “Are there times when you felt differently or saw a different outcome?”


3. Alternative Explanations

Teacher: “Sometimes we jump to one conclusion, but there can be many interpretations. Let’s brainstorm other ways to view the same situation.”

Teacher (Prompt): “What are two or three alternative explanations for what happened?”
(Pause for reflection.)
Teacher (Follow-up): “If a friend described this situation, how might you explain it to them?”


4. Perspective-Taking

Teacher: “It can help to step outside ourselves.”

Teacher (Prompt): “What would you say to a close friend who had this thought?”
(Pause.)
Teacher (Follow-up): “How might their perspective differ from yours?”


5. Reframing the Thought

Teacher: “Using everything we’ve gathered—evidence for and against, alternative explanations, and your own compassionate advice—let’s create a more balanced thought.”

Teacher (Prompt): “How could you rephrase this thought to reflect a fairer, more balanced perspective?”
(Pause for 30–45 seconds.)
Teacher (Follow-up): “What wording feels most believable and helpful to you?”


6. Emotional Check-In

Teacher: “Let’s notice how you feel now.”

Teacher (Prompt): “On a scale of 0 to 10, how intense is your emotion about this situation after reframing?”
(Pause.)
Teacher (Follow-up): “How does that compare to your rating before we began?”


Teacher: “Excellent work. You’ve used your detective tools to uncover evidence, consider new interpretations, and create a balanced thought. Remember, you can practice these questions anytime you notice a distressing thought. Shall we record these insights in your Investigation Journal?”

lenny
lenny

Journal

Investigation Journal

Use this journal to record each step of your cognitive investigation. Bring your entries to your next session for discussion.

Date:




1. Situation

Briefly describe the event or circumstance that triggered your thought.






2. Automatic Thought

Write the immediate thought that went through your mind.






3. Emotion & Intensity

Name the emotion you felt and rate its intensity (0–10).




4. Evidence For the Thought

What facts or memories support this automatic thought?






5. Evidence Against the Thought

What facts or experiences contradict or weaken this thought?






6. Alternative Explanations

List two or three other ways to interpret the same situation.






7. Perspective-Taking

What would you say to a close friend who had this thought? How might their advice differ?




8. Reframed Thought

Using what you’ve learned, craft a more balanced, compassionate statement.




9. Emotional Check-In After Reframing

Rate your emotion now (0–10). Notice any shift in how you feel.



10. Action Plan & Next Steps

What specific steps will you take to test or reinforce this new perspective?








lenny
lenny