Lesson Plan
Constructing Coherent Arguments
Students will be able to construct coherent and well-supported arguments by developing strong thesis statements and effectively integrating evidence.
Mastering argument structure is fundamental for success in academic writing, critical thinking, and effective communication in everyday life. This lesson equips students with essential skills for logical reasoning and persuasive writing.
Audience
11th Grade
Time
75 minutes
Approach
Through direct instruction, guided practice, and collaborative activities, students will build arguments.
Materials
Prep
Teacher Preparation
20 minutes
- Review the Blueprint for Persuasion slide deck.
- Print copies of the Thesis Statement Builder worksheet (one per student).
- Familiarize yourself with the Debate Your Claim discussion prompts.
- Review the Argument Essay Rubric to understand assessment criteria.
- Ensure technology (projector, computer) is working for the slide deck presentation.
Step 1
Introduction & Hook: What Makes a Strong Argument?
10 minutes
- Begin with a thought-provoking question or a short, engaging example of a persuasive argument (or a flawed one).
- Use Blueprint for Persuasion - Slide 1-2.
- Ask students: "What makes an argument convincing? What makes it fall apart?" (Think-Pair-Share).
- Introduce the day's objective: to become 'Argument Architects' and build robust arguments.
Step 2
Direct Instruction: The Argument's Core - Thesis & Claims
20 minutes
- Present key components of an argument using Blueprint for Persuasion - Slide 3-7.
- Focus on:
- Thesis Statement: The central claim; what makes it strong, arguable, and specific.
- Claims/Reasons: Supporting points for the thesis.
- Evidence: Types of evidence (facts, statistics, examples, expert opinions) and why it's crucial.
- Counterclaims & Rebuttals: Acknowledging and refuting opposing views.
- Provide clear examples for each component.
Step 3
Guided Practice: Crafting Your Thesis
15 minutes
- Distribute the Thesis Statement Builder worksheet.
- Guide students through the worksheet, working together on the first example or two.
- Encourage students to brainstorm potential thesis statements for a given topic or a topic of their choice.
- Circulate and provide feedback as students work individually or in small groups.
Step 4
Activity: Debate Your Claim
20 minutes
- Divide students into small groups (3-4 students).
- Introduce the Debate Your Claim activity. Each group will choose one of their thesis statements (or a provided topic) and informally debate it, focusing on presenting claims and evidence.
- Encourage active listening and respectful disagreement.
- Facilitate groups, listening for effective use of claims and evidence.
Step 5
Wrap-up & Reflection: Architect's Checklist
10 minutes
- Bring the class back together.
- Review the main takeaways: strong arguments require a clear thesis, relevant claims, and credible evidence.
- Discuss common pitfalls to avoid (logical fallacies, weak evidence).
- Introduce the Argument Essay Rubric as a tool for self-assessment and future writing.
- Ask students to reflect: "What is one new strategy you'll use to strengthen your arguments?"
use Lenny to create lessons.
No credit card needed
Slide Deck
Argument Architect: Building Powerful Persuasion
Ever tried to convince someone of something? That's an argument! Today, we're becoming architects of ideas.
Objective: Construct coherent and well-supported arguments by developing strong thesis statements and effectively integrating evidence.
Welcome students and introduce the concept of argument. Ask them to consider what makes something persuasive or unpersuasive in their daily lives.
Why Be an Argument Architect?
- Academic Success: Essays, debates, research papers.
- Real Life: Convincing friends, family, or even yourself!
- Critical Thinking: Understanding different viewpoints.
- Empowerment: Making your voice heard effectively.
Transition to the importance of arguments. Why do we need to know this? Connect it to real-world scenarios and academic success.
The Foundation: Your Thesis Statement
What is it? Your main argument or central claim.
It's like the blueprint for your entire essay!
A STRONG THESIS IS:
- Arguable: Someone could reasonably disagree.
- Specific: Not too vague.
- Focused: One main idea.
- Clear: Easy to understand.
Introduce the foundation: the Thesis Statement. Emphasize it as the central claim.
Thesis Statement: Strong vs. Weak
Weak: "Dogs are cool." (Too vague, not arguable)
Stronger: "While some argue cats are more independent, the loyalty and trainability of dogs make them superior companions for families with young children." (Arguable, specific, focused)
Provide examples of strong vs. weak thesis statements. Engage students in identifying the differences.
Building the Walls: Claims & Reasons
Claims (or Reasons): These are the supporting points that prove your thesis statement.
Think of them as the main sections of your argument.
Example Thesis: "Social media addiction is a growing problem among teenagers."
Possible Claims:
- Excessive screen time leads to sleep deprivation.
- It fosters unrealistic social comparisons, impacting mental health.
- It distracts from academic responsibilities.
Move on to claims and reasons. Explain how these support the thesis.
The Interior Design: Evidence!
Evidence: The facts, examples, statistics, and expert opinions that support your claims.
Types of Evidence:
- Facts & Statistics: "70% of teens check social media hourly."
- Examples & Anecdotes: Personal stories, specific events.
- Expert Opinions: Quotes from psychologists, researchers.
- Logical Reasoning: Step-by-step explanations.
Explain the critical role of evidence. Discuss various types.
Reinforcing the Structure: Counterclaims & Rebuttals
Counterclaim: An opposing argument or point of view.
Rebuttal: Your response that refutes or weakens the counterclaim.
Why include them?
- Shows you've considered all sides.
- Strengthens your own argument by anticipating objections.
- Builds credibility.
Address counterclaims and rebuttals, emphasizing the importance of acknowledging opposing viewpoints.
Your Argument Architect's Checklist
Before you build, remember your tools:
- Strong Thesis
- Clear Claims/Reasons
- Solid Evidence
- Thoughtful Counterclaims & Rebuttals
Now, let's start building!
Summarize the key components and prepare students for the activities.
Worksheet
Thesis Statement Builder
Instructions: A strong argument starts with a strong thesis statement. Use this worksheet to brainstorm and develop clear, arguable, and specific thesis statements for various topics.
Part 1: Identifying Strong vs. Weak Thesis Statements
Read each statement below. Mark if it is a Strong Thesis (ST) or a Weak Thesis (WT). If it's weak, explain why and suggest how to make it stronger.
-
Statement: Recycling is good for the environment.
ST/WT:
Why/How to Improve: -
Statement: Public libraries should receive increased funding because they provide essential community resources and promote literacy across all age groups.
ST/WT:
Why/How to Improve: -
Statement: Social media has problems.
ST/WT:
Why/How to Improve: -
Statement: While some argue that year-round schooling reduces summer learning loss, the extended school year also places undue financial burden on families and limits opportunities for extracurricular development.
ST/WT:
Why/How to Improve:
Part 2: Crafting Your Own Thesis Statements
For each topic below, develop one strong, arguable, and specific thesis statement. Remember to consider different perspectives.
Topic 1: The Impact of Technology on Education
Brainstorm Ideas: (e.g., online learning, access to information, distractions, digital literacy)
My Thesis Statement:
Topic 2: Should School Start Later for Teenagers?
Brainstorm Ideas: (e.g., sleep cycles, academic performance, extracurriculars, transportation)
My Thesis Statement:
Topic 3: A topic of your choice!
My Chosen Topic:
Brainstorm Ideas:
My Thesis Statement:
Discussion
Debate Your Claim: Mini-Debate Activity
Instructions: In your small groups, choose one of the thesis statements you developed (or select one of the prompts below). Your goal is to have a short, informal debate where each person practices presenting a claim and supporting it with reasons and potential evidence. Remember to listen actively and respond respectfully!
Choose ONE of the following prompts to debate within your group:
Option 1: Technology in Schools
Prompt: Should all high school students be required to have a laptop or tablet for classroom use?
- Consider: What are the benefits? What are the drawbacks? How does it affect learning or equity?
Option 2: Extracurricular Activities
Prompt: Participation in extracurricular activities is more important for college admissions than a high GPA.
- Consider: What kind of experiences do extracurriculars offer? How do colleges weigh different factors?
Option 3: Year-Round Schooling
Prompt: Implementing year-round schooling would significantly improve student academic performance.
- Consider: What are the arguments for and against? What impact would it have on students, teachers, and families?
Option 4: Your Own Thesis Statement
Prompt: Use one of the strong thesis statements your group developed during the Thesis Statement Builder activity.
Group Discussion Guidelines:
- Presenter 1: State your chosen thesis/claim clearly.
- Presenter 2: Offer a supporting reason or piece of evidence for the claim.
- Presenter 3: Acknowledge a potential counterclaim and offer a brief rebuttal.
- Everyone: Ask clarifying questions, challenge ideas respectfully, and offer additional support or counter-arguments.
Reflection Questions for your group (discuss orally):
- What was the strongest claim or piece of evidence presented in your debate?
- Was it easy or difficult to think of counterclaims? Why?
- What did you learn about the importance of evidence in making an argument?
- How can practicing debates like this help you with your writing?
Rubric
Argument Essay Rubric
Instructions: This rubric will be used to evaluate your argument essays. It outlines the criteria for success in constructing a compelling and well-supported argument.
| Criteria | 4 - Exceeds Expectations | 3 - Meets Expectations | 2 - Developing | 1 - Beginning |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thesis Statement | Presents a sophisticated, highly arguable, specific, and insightful thesis that clearly establishes the essay's focus and position. | Presents a clear, arguable, and specific thesis statement that establishes the essay's focus and position. | Presents a thesis statement that is somewhat clear but may lack arguable depth or specificity. The position may be unclear. | Lacks a clear thesis statement, or the thesis is merely a statement of fact or too broad/narrow to be argued effectively. |
| Claims/Reasons | Develops multiple, logical, and compelling claims that directly and effectively support the thesis. Each claim is distinct and well-articulated. | Develops clear and logical claims that support the thesis. Claims are generally distinct and contribute to the overall argument. | Claims are present but may lack clarity, logical connection to the thesis, or sufficient development. Some claims may be repetitive. | Claims are absent, illogical, or do not support the thesis. The argument structure is weak or difficult to follow. |
| Evidence Integration | Integrates varied, credible, and highly relevant evidence seamlessly and effectively to support all claims. Evidence is thoughtfully analyzed and clearly connected to the argument. | Integrates relevant and credible evidence to support claims. Evidence is generally analyzed and connected to the argument, though connections could be more explicit at times. | Attempts to integrate evidence, but it may be limited in variety, credibility, or relevance. Analysis of evidence may be superficial or missing, with weak connections to claims. | Provides little to no relevant evidence, or evidence is used inappropriately (e.g., dropped quotes, misinterpretations). No analysis or connection to claims. |
| Counterclaims & Rebuttals | Addresses sophisticated counterclaims thoroughly and refutes them powerfully with logical and well-supported rebuttals, significantly strengthening the original argument. | Addresses relevant counterclaims and offers clear rebuttals that support the original argument. | Acknowledges counterclaims but rebuttals may be weak, illogical, or underdeveloped. May not fully strengthen the original argument. | Fails to acknowledge counterclaims, or the attempt to do so is confused, irrelevant, or simply states an opposing view without a rebuttal. |
| Organization & Cohesion | Demonstrates exceptional organization with clear transitions, logical flow, and a sophisticated structure that enhances the argument's persuasiveness. | Demonstrates clear organization with logical transitions and a coherent structure that supports the argument. | Organization is generally present but may have minor breaks in logic or clarity. Transitions may be abrupt or simplistic. | Lacks clear organization; ideas are presented haphazardly. Transitions are absent or confusing, making the essay difficult to follow. |
| Language & Style | Uses precise, sophisticated, and varied language. Sentence structure is complex and varied, enhancing clarity and impact. Tone is consistently academic and persuasive. | Uses clear and appropriate language. Sentence structure is generally varied. Tone is academic and mostly persuasive. | Language is sometimes unclear, repetitive, or informal. Sentence structure may be simplistic. Tone may be inconsistent. | Language is consistently imprecise, simplistic, or inappropriate for academic writing. Sentence structure is basic or confusing. Tone is inappropriate or absent. |