• lenny-learning-logoLenny Learning
  • Home
    Home
    • Lessons
    Lessons
  • Curriculum
    Curriculum
  • Surveys
    Surveys
  • Videos
    Videos
  • Support
    Support
  • Log In
lenny

Can History Solve a Mystery?

user image

Jacob Winkelman

Tier 1
For Schools

Lesson Plan

Historical Detective Lesson Plan

Students will act as historical detectives, analyzing primary sources to solve a mysterious 19th-century event. They will collaborate to gather evidence, draw conclusions, and present their findings.

This lesson builds critical thinking, evidence-based reasoning, and historical empathy by engaging students in active primary-source analysis and collaborative problem-solving.

Audience

8th Grade

Time

50 minutes

Approach

Inquiry-based source analysis with station rotations and debate.

Materials

  • Mystery Case Files Slides, - Primary Source Pack, - Clue Analysis Stations, and - Debriefing Debate

Prep

Prepare Materials and Stations

10 minutes

  • Review the Mystery Case Files Slides to familiarize yourself with the narrative hook and guiding questions.
  • Print and arrange the Clue Analysis Stations around the room.
  • Preview the Primary Source Pack, noting varied reading levels for differentiation.
  • Set up digital timers or signals for station rotations.
  • Prepare any sentence starters or graphic organizers for emerging readers.

Step 1

Hook & Mystery Introduction

5 minutes

  • Display the first slide of the Mystery Case Files Slides.
  • Pose the central question: “What really happened in the missing shipment case of 1875?”
  • Activate prior knowledge: ask students what clues historians use when evidence is scarce.
  • Differentiate: provide key vocabulary definitions on the board for struggling readers.

Step 2

Source Exploration

15 minutes

  • Distribute the Primary Source Pack with letters, newspaper clippings, and diary entries.
  • Students read individually or in pairs, annotating key details and questions.
  • Provide highlighters and annotation guides. Struggling readers get adapted transcripts; advanced students get full facsimiles.
  • Circulate to support comprehension and probe deeper analysis.

Step 3

Analysis Stations

15 minutes

  • Divide class into four groups; assign each to a Clue Analysis Station.
  • At each station, students examine a specific source, answer guided questions, and record evidence on a shared chart.
  • Rotate every 3–4 minutes. Use timers to keep on schedule.
  • Support groups needing extra help with sentence frames; encourage advanced groups to infer motives.

Step 4

Debriefing Debate

10 minutes

  • Reconvene whole class for a structured debate using the Debriefing Debate.
  • Pose two competing theories: theft by port workers vs. sabotage by rivals.
  • Assign sides; give 2 minutes to prepare arguments using station charts.
  • Conduct debate, ensuring each student contributes at least one point.
  • Encourage evidence citation; provide debate prompts for EL learners.

Step 5

Reflection & Wrap-Up

5 minutes

  • Ask students to write a brief exit ticket: “Which theory do you support and why?” citing two pieces of evidence.
  • Collect tickets for formative assessment.
  • Highlight how historical detectives use evidence and reasoning.
  • Extend learning: suggest independent research on other unsolved cases.
lenny

Slide Deck

Mystery Case Files: The 1875 Missing Shipment

In June 1875, a merchant’s valuable cargo vanished without a trace. No accident, no report—just empty crates and unanswered questions.

Today, you become detectives of the past. What really happened?

Set the stage with a dramatic reveal. Apply the gradient background (#64B5F6 → #2196F3). Welcome students as historical detectives and build suspense. Prompt: “Imagine you’ve traveled back to 1875—what secrets lie in a missing shipment?”

Historical Context

• Major shipping routes linked factories in the East to markets worldwide.
• In June 1875, a merchant’s shipment to Port Harbor disappeared overnight.
• No record of storm damage, accident, or official theft claim.
• Historians piece together clues from scattered documents.

Display a period map or shipping route image in the background if possible. Help students connect to 19th-century trade networks.

Meet the Primary Sources

📜 Captain’s Letter – Weather report and crew tensions.
📰 Newspaper Clipping – Sensational press account.
📓 Dockworker’s Diary – Firsthand quay observations.
📋 Cargo Ledger – Official inventory and shipping instructions.

Show thumbnail images of each document on the slide. Invite students to note date, author, and purpose as they preview.

Guiding Questions

• What key details does each source reveal about the disappearance?
• Who might have had motive or opportunity to tamper with the cargo?
• Do accounts conflict? How might bias shape each narrative?
• What gaps remain in the story?

Encourage students to jot quick thoughts. Project these questions for reference during analysis.

Analysis Stations

Station 1: Captain’s Letter – Highlight claims and tone.
Station 2: Newspaper Clipping – Differentiate fact vs. sensationalism.
Station 3: Dockworker’s Diary – Extract firsthand details and reliability.
Station 4: Cargo Ledger – Compare manifest vs. reported items.

Rotate every 3–4 minutes and record findings on your chart.

Use icons or color-coded station cards to match each source. Display a timer on screen for 3–4 minute rotations.

Debriefing Debate

Two competing theories:

  1. Theft by port workers using insider knowledge.
  2. Sabotage by rival merchants to damage reputation.

Each side crafts one opening statement and two supporting points using station notes.

Split class into two sides. Model a strong opening statement citing a specific excerpt. Remind students to listen respectfully and build on evidence.

Reflection & Next Steps

Exit Ticket:
• Which theory do you support and why?
• Cite two pieces of evidence from your analysis.

Extension: Research another unsolved historical mystery and compare investigative methods.

Ask students to complete silently and submit as they leave. Highlight how evidence grounds historical interpretation and point out open questions for future inquiry.

lenny

Lesson Plan

Historical Detective Lesson Plan

Students will assume the role of historical detectives to analyze 19th-century primary sources, collaborate in station rotations, and debate competing theories to solve the 1875 missing shipment mystery.

This lesson builds critical thinking, evidence-based reasoning, and historical empathy through hands-on analysis of authentic documents. Collaboration and debate reinforce communication skills and deepen understanding of how historians reconstruct events from fragmentary evidence.

Audience

8th Grade

Time

50 minutes

Approach

Inquiry-based source analysis with station rotations and structured debate

Materials

  • Mystery Case Files Slides, - Primary Source Pack, - Clue Analysis Stations, and - Debriefing Debate

Prep

Prepare Materials and Stations

10 minutes

  • Review the Mystery Case Files Slides to internalize the narrative hook and guiding questions.
  • Print and organize the Clue Analysis Stations around the room, one per group.
  • Preview the Primary Source Pack, noting which items need adapted transcripts for emerging readers.
  • Set up digital or physical timers for 3–4 minute rotations.
  • Prepare sentence starters or graphic organizers to support English learners and struggling readers.

Step 1

Hook & Mystery Introduction

5 minutes

  • Project the opening slide of the Mystery Case Files Slides.
  • Ask: “What really happened in the missing shipment case of 1875?” to spark curiosity.
  • Elicit prior knowledge: what types of evidence do historians use?
  • Display and define key vocabulary (e.g., ‘manifest,’ ‘bias,’ ‘reliability’) for all learners.

Step 2

Source Exploration

15 minutes

  • Distribute the Primary Source Pack containing a captain’s letter, newspaper clipping, dockworker’s diary, and cargo ledger.
  • Students read individually or in pairs, annotating details and questions using highlighters and annotation guides.
  • Provide adapted transcripts to struggling readers and original facsimiles to advanced readers.
  • Circulate to support comprehension and prompt deeper inference questions.

Step 3

Analysis Stations

15 minutes

  • Divide the class into four groups and assign each to a Clue Analysis Station.
  • At each station, examine one source and answer guided questions on a shared chart.
  • Rotate groups every 3–4 minutes when the timer signals.
  • Offer sentence frames (e.g., “This source suggests…”) to groups that need extra scaffolding.

Step 4

Debriefing Debate

10 minutes

  • Reconvene as a whole class and introduce two theories: theft by port workers vs. sabotage by rival merchants.
  • Assign half the class to each theory; allow 2 minutes to craft opening arguments using station notes.
  • Conduct a structured debate: each side delivers an opening statement and two supporting points.
  • Encourage citation of specific evidence; supply debate prompts for EL learners.

Step 5

Reflection & Wrap-Up

5 minutes

  • Students complete an exit ticket: “Which theory do you support and why? Cite two pieces of evidence.”
  • Collect exit tickets for formative assessment.
  • Highlight how historians piece together evidence and acknowledge remaining gaps.
  • Suggest as an extension: research another unsolved historical mystery and compare investigative methods.
lenny

Reading

Primary Source Pack

Explore these four authentic documents to gather clues about the 1875 missing shipment. As you read each, use the annotation prompts to guide your thinking.

1. Captain’s Letter

Background: In a report to the Port Harbor Shipping Company dated June 12, 1875, Captain Andrew Whitmore describes unusual weather and crew concerns as his vessel approached port.

Transcription:
To the Port Harbor Shipping Company,

I write to report that as we neared the port on June 12, we encountered calm seas until dusk when a strange fog rolled in. Our crew grew uneasy over rumors of missing crates. First Mate Briggs noted that two barrels were lighter than our records indicated, but no source of tampering was found on deck. I trust we can resolve the matter swiftly.

Your obedient servant,
Captain Andrew Whitmore

Annotation Prompts:

  • What details does the captain mention about weather and crew concerns?
  • How does his tone and word choice shape your view of the incident?
  • What questions does this letter raise?




2. Newspaper Clipping

Background: Excerpt from the Port Harbor Gazette published June 15, 1875, offering a dramatic account of the vanished cargo.

Transcription:
"The Mysterious Vanishing at Dockside!"
Port Harbor Gazette – June 15, 1875

In an astonishing turn of events, a merchant ship docked at Port Harbor yesterday only to find its precious cargo vanished without explanation. Eyewitnesses report seeing suspicious figures lurking near the crates. Some say this act of daring theft could only be the work of an inside accomplice.

Investigations continue as the city demands answers.

Annotation Prompts:

  • Highlight words or phrases that seem sensational.
  • What facts does the article present?
  • How might the newspaper’s goal affect its reliability?







3. Dockworker’s Diary

Background: Private entries by Samuel Clarke, a dockworker on duty the nights of June 13–14, 1875.

Transcription:
June 13, 1875 – I came on shift before sunrise. The crates looked normal until lunch when I noticed a pair of boots beyond the gangway that did not match any of the dayhands. Thought nothing of it until Briggs whispered something. Might be trouble.

June 14, 1875 – Heard strange rattling near hold number 3 after midnight. Two shadows passed. I could not make them out, but the locks on the crates seemed fresh.

Annotation Prompts:

  • What first-hand details does Samuel record?
  • Why might he include observations that others overlook?
  • How much trust do you place in his account, and why?












4. Cargo Ledger

Background: Official cargo manifest from June 10–11, 1875, listing items loaded and recorded upon arrival.

Transcription:
Port Harbor Shipping Company Cargo Manifest
Date: June 10, 1875

• Silk Cloth: 200 bolts
• Tea: 50 crates
• Porcelain Ware: 30 crates
• Spices (assorted): 100 sacks

Recorded on Arrival (June 12):
• Silk Cloth: 200 bolts
• Tea: 45 crates
• Porcelain Ware: 30 crates
• Spices: 100 sacks

Five crates of tea listed as missing.

Annotation Prompts:

  • What discrepancies do you notice between loaded and arrived goods?
  • How could this record support one of the competing theories?
  • What else would you want to know about the missing tea?
lenny
lenny

Activity

Clue Analysis Stations

At each station, your group will examine one primary source, answer the guiding questions, and record your findings on the shared evidence chart. Rotate every 3–4 minutes when the timer signals.

Station 1: Captain’s Letter

Source: Primary Source Pack – Captain’s Letter

Tasks:

  • Read the excerpt carefully and highlight details about weather and crew concerns.
  • Discuss how the captain’s tone and word choice influence your interpretation.
  • Answer the guiding questions below.

Guiding Questions:

  1. What details does the captain mention about weather and crew concerns?
  2. How does his tone and word choice shape your view of the incident?
  3. What new questions does this letter raise?




Station 2: Newspaper Clipping

Source: Primary Source Pack – Newspaper Clipping

Tasks:

  • Identify and highlight sensational or dramatic language.
  • Separate stated facts from possible exaggerations.
  • Answer the guiding questions below.

Guiding Questions:

  1. Which words or phrases seem sensational?
  2. What facts does the article clearly present?
  3. How might the newspaper’s purpose affect its reliability?




Station 3: Dockworker’s Diary

Source: Primary Source Pack – Dockworker’s Diary

Tasks:

  • Note first-hand observations and any details that others might overlook.
  • Consider the author’s perspective and possible biases.
  • Answer the guiding questions below.

Guiding Questions:

  1. What specific details does Samuel record about the night of June 13–14?
  2. Why might he include observations that others ignore?
  3. How much trust do you place in his account, and why?




Station 4: Cargo Ledger

Source: Primary Source Pack – Cargo Ledger

Tasks:

  • Compare the loaded items list with the arrived items list.
  • Highlight any discrepancies or missing goods.
  • Answer the guiding questions below.

Guiding Questions:

  1. What discrepancies do you notice between loaded and arrived goods?
  2. How could this record support one of the competing theories?
  3. What additional information would help explain the missing tea crates?




Shared Evidence Chart

Use this chart to record your group’s findings at each station. After rotating through all stations, you’ll use this chart to prepare for the debate.

StationKey DetailsTone / BiasQuestions RaisedEvidence Summary
1. Captain’s Letter
2. Newspaper Clipping
3. Dockworker’s Diary
4. Cargo Ledger

Rotate promptly when the timer rings and make sure each station chart entry is complete before moving on.

lenny
lenny

Discussion

Debriefing Debate

Purpose

Sharpen your historical detective skills by using evidence from your station rotations to argue for one of two theories about the 1875 missing shipment.

Setup

  1. Form two teams:
    • Team Theft by Port Workers
    • Team Sabotage by Rival Merchants
  2. Each team selects a Speaker 1 (opening), Speaker 2 (supporting), and Speaker 3 (rebuttal/conclusion).
  3. Gather at your tables with your completed chart from the Clue Analysis Stations.
  4. You have 2 minutes to plan your opening statement and two supporting points. Use your evidence chart to choose the strongest clues.

Debate Format (10 minutes total)

  1. Opening Statements (1 minute total)

    • Speaker 1 from each team (30 seconds each) presents your main claim.

  2. Supporting Points (4 minutes total)

    • Alternate speakers: each team offers two pieces of evidence.
    • Team A Speaker 2 (45 seconds) → Team B Speaker 2 (45 seconds) → Team A Speaker 2 (45 seconds) → Team B Speaker 2 (45 seconds).

  3. Rebuttal and Conclusion (3 minutes total)

    • Speaker 3 from each team (45 seconds each) responds to the other side’s evidence and restates your strongest point.

  4. Class Reflection (2 minutes)

    • Whole‐class vote on which argument was most persuasive and why.

Expectations & Guidelines

  • Listen respectfully and take notes on the other side’s evidence.
  • Cite specific sources (e.g., “In the Cargo Ledger, five crates of tea disappeared…”).
  • Speak clearly and stay within your time limit.
  • Use sentence starters below if you need help.

Sentence Starters & Scaffolds (EL Support)

Opening

  • “Our theory is that __________ because __________.”
  • “We believe port workers had motive/opportunity due to __________.”

Supporting

  • “For example, in the Captain’s Letter, the captain notes __________, which suggests __________.”
  • “According to the Cargo Ledger, __________ crates were missing, indicating __________.”

Rebuttal

  • “While the other team claims __________, we contend that __________ because __________.”
  • “That evidence overlooks the fact that __________, as shown in __________.”

Conclusion

  • “In conclusion, the strongest evidence is __________ because __________.”




Ready… Set… Debate!

lenny
lenny